cover letter(投稿信)实用指南(经验经历分享)(转载零点花园)

[转载]COVER LETTER（投稿信）实用指南(经验经历分享)(转载零点花园)

如何询问稿件及编辑答复！

Dear Editor,

I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you again to inquire about the status of my submitted

manuscript(ref:****) although nearly one month have passed since I contacted you last time. I

would be greatly appreciate if

you could spend some of your time check the status for me.

Best regards

***

老外的答复：

Dear ***,

Thank you for your e-mail. We would like to sincerely apologise for the long delay in reviewing

your article. Your article was sent to many different referees, most of whom felt that they were

either unqualified or their time was too restricted to review the paper. We understand that you

must feel frustrated, and we are sorry for this. Please understand that we rely entirely on the

referee’s to return articles to us speedily. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. It would be

much appreciated if you could suggest an alternative referee for your article, a person who may be

able to review the article in a more appropriate time frame. Please forward this person's contact

details (e-mail address) to us as soon as possible. We will do our very best to speed up the process.

We apologize for any inconvenience that you experienced due to this delay, and we appreciate

your understanding and tried patience in this regard.

邀请函上没有老外签名，无法签证

背景介绍：老外的签名跟我们的盖章查不多，没有签名的东西是不正式

的，我去参加某次国际会议，签证的时候才发现，粗心的老外给我的邀

请函没有他的签名，我只好email 给她询问，并要求马上传真给我。

我的去信：

Dear Ms. Rose:

I'm Whyerect from China，who plans to participate the 11th International Symposium on Data

Mining 2002 in Sydney. The poster number of my paper is 007.

I found the 'OFFICIAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER' you sent to me was lack of your signature. I'm

afraid this would cause some trouble when I go to the embassy for my visa. Could you please send

me a fax or electronic version of OFFICIAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER with your autograph?

Thank you!

Regards

Whyerect

老外的答复：

Dear Whyerect:

Thank you for your message. I am sorry that the corrected invitation has not reached you. I have

requested a new mailing to be sent to you today.

Best Regards,

Rose

我的再去信：

Dear Ms. Rose:

could you please fax a copy of my acceptance letter fist so that I could have enough time for my

visa application? The visa application will take me about 2-3 weeks according to the embassy.

Thanks a lot!

Regards

Whyerect

老外的再答复：

Dear Whyerect:

The invitation letter for your presentation at SPIE's International Symposium Data Mining (22-27

October 2002) has been mailed. An Adobe acrobat pdf file of the letter is attached to this message

for your use. We look forward to your participation in Sydney.

Best regards,

Rose

没有出席会议，索要论文集

背景：会议论文被录用，但没有出席会议，对方邮寄了光盘，询问是否

有纸质论文集。

我的去信：

Dear Sean

Thanks for sending the CD-ROM copy, but I have not received the book (the prodeedings), I want

to know whether a book should be included .

As you know, the printed copy would be more believable and useful as a reference,If I want one

how much it cost? thank you

Best wishes

Jinke

对方回信：

Hello Dr.

A printed version is 125 plus whatever shipping and currency conversion costs. They can be

ordered and paid for through the same route as previously.

Cheers

Dr. Sean D. Dessureault

2005 APCOM Chairman

产品中农药残留检测付费事宜

背景：我没有具体的和老外们联系讨论过什么投稿啊参加会议的事情,

但是有过很多和他们联系其他相关事宜的情况.以下是和某德国实验室

联系的E-mail,讨论的是在按照EP,产品中农药残留检测已经付相关费

用的问题.希望也可以对大家有所借鉴!

我的去信：

Dear ****,

I am oe work for ooCo., Ltd.

I have recevied the fax about analysis payment. Could you give me detail

information about your bank account. So that I can pay as soon as possible.

Best Wishes,

*****

老外的回信：

Dear *****,

attached you find the invoice for the analysis of pesticide residues

including bank account information.

In case of any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards

****

版权转让声明及确认校样

背景：论文已被接收，编辑要求我提供签名的版权申明和确认校样，我

与编辑之间的通信。

我的去信：

Dear editor,

I've gone through this article and found a wrong word. The 143th line the

word \"m\" shoud be \"the\". I noted it in the query form.

Please give me a back e-mail. Thank you very much.

Best wishes.

Yours,

***

老外的回复：

Dear Dr. ***,

I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the corrections.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Yours sincerely,

****

我的再去信：

Dear ****,

I've read carefully the 'Transfer of copyright agreement' and signed it. Now

I e-mailed it to you.In addition,we will not order the offprints at the present time.

Please send me a back e-mail if you receive this messenge. Thank you very

much!

Yours sincerely,

***

老外的再回复：

通知我版权申明已经收到

Dear ***,

I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the signed copyright form.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Yours sincerely,

****

背景：老外发给我的审稿人意见及mail

老外的email:

Dear***,

Please find enclosed the re-review from one of the previous reviewers of your manuscript. As you

can see, he is now in favor of publishing your article if you can modify your paper to answer his

questions.

If you feel that you can answer his questions appropriately, then please provide a revised

manuscript based on the recommendations of the reviewers together with a

disk or CD of the

revision using a standard word processing program. You must also send along with the revision a

cover letter that details your responses to each point in the reviewers' comments.

Thank you once again for your interest in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. I am sorry for the delay in

processing your manuscript.

Doinit L. Sr.

老外的审稿意见：

Reviewer Comments for USAM 2005.6

Title of Paper: ***

Authors: ***

Ref. No. USAM2005.6

RECOMMENDATION: PUBLISH WITH REVISION

I appreciate the progress and effort that the authors have made. I note some significant progress in

this revised article. By replacing \"new\" with the word of \"simple\my argument about

the novelty of the method in making soft metal nanoparticles, because it is the first article that

report to pulverizing Sn metal into the size as small as 50 nm. Maybe the word \"facile\" is more

appropriate.

I am still having trouble understanding the mechanism of the formation of Sn nanoparticle

proposed by the author. Because the hardness of Sn is 1.5 in mineralogical scale, where Mg and

Zn have 2.5 (Samsonov, G.V. \"Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the Elements\"

IFI/Plenum, 1968, pp. 432), it is not surprising that Sn can be pulverizing into small particles

under high-intensity of ultrasound. What I have trouble with is that the surface area should not be

large enough to have the authors worried about in reducing the surface energy of particles with

aggregation (I calculated the surface area of Sn particles at 50 nm is c.a. 12 m2/g). I really don't

think the oxide coating and solvent molecules would depress the aggregation because I don't think

there would be aggregation occurring.

Overall, it is my opinion that the article should be published if the authors can clarify the question

about the mechanism of aggregation.

Please note that the references are not uniform in format from No 15 down.

投稿信

背景：我的投稿信

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am submitting here a manuscript entitled “**************”. The manuscript consists of 10

pages of text, 2 pages of 4 figures, 1 page of 2 tables, 1 page of captions of figures.

I would be grateful if the manuscript could be reviewed and considered for publication in your

\"****** \".

Yours sincerely,

Prof. ********

老外请我审稿

背景：小弟近来在本领域渐成气候，竟然有某知名国际期刊请我替某

编辑审稿，我以不熟悉该领域为由，拒绝了他，原文如下：

老外的来信：

Dear Dr. ******

Research Paper ID # No.007, entitled \"**********\with Prof. Smith as

corresponding author,

has been submitted to the International Journal of ABC.I invite you to review this manuscript for

one of our Editors, Dr. John. The abstract appears at the end of this email, along with the names of

the authors. We normally expect reviews of Research Letters to be completed in two to three

weeks, and reviews of other manuscript types to be completed in five to six weeks.

Please let me know as soon as possible if you will be able to accept my invitation to review. If

you are unable to review at this time, I would appreciate your recommending another expert

referee.

Please click the appropriate link at the bottom of the page to automatically register your reply with

our online manuscript submission and review system.

Once you accept my invitation to review this manuscript, you will receive an email of

confirmation, and then the manuscript will be available for you to examine in your 'Referee

Centre' in our IJABC - Manuscript Central website. The email will tell you how to access this and

how to submit your review on-line. If you require any further assistance, please contact me

***************.deIrealisethatourexpertrefereesgreatlycontributetothe high standards of

our journal, and I thank you for your present and/or future participation.

Yours sincerely

****

我的答复：

Dear Dr. *****

I am afraid that I can not make it because I am not familar with this topic. I

would be very happy

to review papers that are close to my research interests, e.g. Support Vector Machine.

Yours sincerely

******

老外的再回信：

Dear Dr. ******

Thank you for replying to my invitation to review manuscript ID # No.007 for the International

Journal of ABC. It is unfortunate that you are unable to review this manuscript at this time.

I will keep you in mind when future manuscripts come in that fall under your area of expertise.

Yours sincerely

*********

讨论对方实验室资格的一些问题.

背景：下面是我将某个产品送到德国某个实验室,按照欧洲药典检测其

中的35 中农药残留的一些E-mail,主要是讨论方法验证以及对方的实验

室资格的一些问题.

对方的回复:

Dear Dr. ***,

Jack has still wishes (see below). Please would you provide a copy of an authorized license and

send it directly to Mr. John at \"**\" <***@hrm.com>.

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,

****

我的去信:

Professor ****,

I have explained what you said to my colleagues and they agreed that additional validation is not

necessary. However, would you like to contact ** to provide a authorized license? Maybe it is

necessary when *** register in the other countries.

For the testing report, writing the client as \"***Co.,Ltd\" instead of \" ***Co., Ltd. Research and

Development Center of Plant Medicine\" would be appreciated.

Best regards.

***

对方的来信:

Dear **,

Please let me know whether the report about the pesticide analysis is OK now or not.

Otherwise L*T cannot send the original of the report to H**.

Best regards,

G*r S*z

文章修改过程

背景介绍：老外发给我审稿人意见，我照着修改后发回。第一位审稿人

（主审），建议发表，但是提出了一些问题，主要是提出：有些问题原

文说明的不清楚或者机理解释的不合理，提供该方法的准确度、检测元

件使用寿命等专业问题，并且提出语言需要修改和打印的错误修订。第

二位审稿人（副审），建议发表，同样提出问题：机理解释有疑问，建

议进一步表征等。我回复主要是依据审稿人的意见逐条回复，可能有些

涉及专业词汇，基本上是一一对应。说明了修改了哪些内容，怎莫表示

的等等。需要说明的是，该文章已经发表并印刷出来。2003 IF 2.39

审稿人意见：

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Major Revision

This paper reports on the development of a stripping voltammetry procedure for the determination

of thallium and cadmium in water using a modified glassy carbon electrode with a

Langmuir-Blodgett film of p-allylcalix[4]arene coating.

The study is well planned and performed. Additionally, the topic that it covers is interesting;

consequently, I feel that the paper merits publication in ACA, but with some revision. Following

are some aspects for the authors to consider:

1 The characterization of Langmuir monolayers is made as usual through the measurement of the

surface pressure versus area isotherms. Some characteristics of isotherms should be offered, i.e.,

the limiting area per molecule (it seems to be around 0.8 nm2/molecule from Figure 2) and the

collapse pressure. Additionally, more information on LB film preparation should be included in

2.3 section (p. 5) related to the solutions used and their concentrations.

2 All reagents used for experimental work and the suppliers should be indicated in Section 2.2

(p.2), not only for the Tl2SO4 reagent.

3 The lifetime of the proposed electrode must be discussed with experimental data.

4 The central idea of this study is the development of a new non-mercury electrode for the

stripping analysis of metals. This means, additionally, the correct study of potential interferent

species to compare with conventional electrodes. The study of interferents must be improved by

including more ions such as Pb(II), Bi(III), Ni(II) or Cu(II) and giving results in a new table.

5 The precision of the proposed procedure must be studied.

6 The applicability of procedure to drinking water is doubtful taking into account the detection

limit found (>1 mg.L-1) and the natural level of analytes in waters. In fact, the application that the

authors offer is to spiked clean water (lake water and tap water). Did the authors consider

potential application to polluted water?

7 As the authors propose the simultaneous determination of Tl and Cd and since Figure 4

suggests some overlapping of stripping g*L-1 level, it seems

necessary ?voltamograms for both

metals at a 150 to study the resolution of both signals in the lab, indicating the concentration

range for both metals in which resolution is possible.

8 The heading of Table 1 indicates recovery and precision for the tap and lake water analyzed,

but the table does not include data for precision.

9 The whole manuscript should be revised for some typewriting errors and the English should be

improved.

10 In brief, I think that the idea is interesting but the authors need to improve some aspects of

their work as indicated above n order to demonstrate its real feasibility.

Reviewer #2: Minor Revision

This is an interesting paper focusing on the use of LB films of calix[4]arenes for the determination

of thallium and cadmium.

Its publication can be recommended, after considering the following points:

1) Why are they assuming that the calix[4]arenes are interacting with the glassy carbon electrode

through the phenolic groups, rather than through the hydrophobic aromatic allyl groups? This

possibility would not be preferred using the LB technique?

2) The binding of the metal ions would not be more favorable at the lower rim OH groups?

3) Spectroscopic, and microscopy (SPM, TEM) investigation of the LB-Tl, Cd surfaces would be

very informative in this case.

4) Considering that only one layer has been deposited, and the evidence provided by the authors

that it remains permeable to large ions, such as ferrocyanide, how one can be sure that the metal

deposition is not occurring at the surface holes? Otherwise, how a non conducting layer would

mediate electron transfer in the reduction/stripping process?

5) A very interesting result would be the comparison between the behavior of the LB films of the

t-butyl and allyl calix[4]arenes.

Language revision will be necessary.

我的回复：

Following are our response about reviewers’ comment to our manuscript No ***-***-00**0:

1 The following sentence was additional among the text in order to contribute more information of

LB film.

‘The limiting area and collapsing pressure of p-allylcalix[4]arene is 0.75 nm2 per molecule and

34mNm respectively on pure water ‘ was provided in section 3.1.

‘Measurement of π-A isotherms and preparation of LB monolayer were performed with JML-04

LB trough (Shanghai Zhongchen Company, P R China). The spreading solutions were prepared by

dissolving about 1-2 mg of the compound in 10 ml of dichloromethane. All spreading solutions

were kept at 5 °C and renewed every 2 weeks.’ was provided in section 2.3.

2 CdCl2 and other chemicals were purchased from local company as analytical reagents and used

without further purification. Therefore, this sentence will be appeared in the text.

3 The response of AllylCA-GCE did not change remarkably after two months. The lifetime of

proposed electrode should be longer. We add the first sentence in our revision.

4 In order to make clear, one table about interferences will be appeared in our revision.

5 The precision of proposed procedure were given in the table 2.

6 We consider that this electrode can detect metal ion of polluted water. Unfortunately，suitable

sullage sample was not found in our area.

7 We want to ensure they won’t interfere with each other. It seems to the peak of thallium and

cadmium could not be separated entirely for partly overlapping in Fig 4 A.

8 We calculate relative standard deviation of method and provided it in table 2.

9 we correct some typewriting errors which were appeared in our manuscript.

10 The molecular orientation can be controlled easily using LB technique. The type Z LB film

means hydrophilic group interact with glassy carbon electrode.

11 We have done experiment on electrode modified with calixarene(pasted on the surface of GC

electrode), that is, molecular orientation was arranged freely. The response decrease sharply. We

suppose it can due to decreasing of amount of allyl group on the same area. Therefore, we

supposed that would not happened

12 The spectroscopic or microscopy investigation is unnecessary base on the above reason.

13 Metal can be deposited on the surface hole. However, the response of bare electrode is much

less than that of AllylCA-GCE. We suppose this can be neglected.

14 The ferrocyanide is the larger ion, and it can not permeate the calixarene cavity and exchange

electron with electrode. However, the supporting electrolyte can permeate the cavity freely.

15 The electrode modified with LB film of p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene cannot recognize thallium and

cadmium at all.

16 We apologized for our poor English. We will try to improve it in revision.

17 In order to highlight the change what we have done, the color of text changed will become red.

要求减免版面费

背景：文章已经被接收 但是要交版面费 虽然是老板出 但咱是发展中

国家 能省就省这次减免费用是成功的 文章已经发表

编辑部来信：

Dear Dr××,

Thank you for choosing ××××to publish your work. Your manuscript will be forwarded to the

printers next week. Also all manuscripts printed in Vol. 10, No. 4, 2005 will be available on our

web site: www.××.org.pl soon.

We inform you that page charges:10 printed pages x $20 per page = $200 (two hundred US dollars)

plus postage should be transferred to our account. You will receive 50 free reprints. If you would

like to order extra 50 reprints you may do so at an extra charge of $100.00 (one hundred US

dollars) plus postage. We will send you an invoice. Please let us know how many reprints do you

order and to whom the invoice should be send. If you want to pay by credit card, please, let us

know, I will send you a form to fill in.

Best regards,

×××

我的回信：

Dear Editor:

We are glad to see that our paper will be published in ××××. Thanks a million for your work.

Although we have been supported by an external grant source, we must admit that it is not enough

money to pay page charges We hope to waive page charges expect for payments for language

corrections and color figures.

Best wishes,

Authors:

编辑回信：

Dear Dr ××,

After discussion of your special case all three Editors agreed to cover partially your page charges.

We inform you that page charges will be: 10 printed pages x $5 per page = $50 (fifty US dollars)

plus postage ($40), total $90 (ninety US dollars).Please let us know the address of the institution

which will pay the bill and to whom the invoice and reprints should be sent.

Best regards,

文章被初步接收

背景：投送文章被初步接收

老外的来信：

Dear*,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise

your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to

reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. In addition to the modifications

requested by the Editor you should add the names of ALL the authors in the list of references

(unless they are really too many, for instance over 12-15.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point

which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

Managing Editor

附:审稿人意见

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Ms. Ref. No.: GENE-D-05-00014

1) I do not understand why the authors refer to Komaguchi et al (who cloned

the chicken Lmbr1

gene) as our lab, since any of the authors are common.

2) To complete Fig. 1 please mark the position of Primer 13 (R)

3) Page 17 line 14, should be gAA > gAB >gBB

4) Page 25 line 18, should be 1254C1255G

我的回信：

Dear Managing Editor:

We have revised the manuscript according to reviewers' and your comments. In this revision, all

the authors have been listed in the references. In our point-by-point response attached below,

reviewer comment is in larger fonts (12 pt) and our response is in smaller fonts (10 pt). In addition,

Title and Coauthors have several changes. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.

Reviewer #1: MS. Ref. No.: GENE-D-05-00014

1) I do not understand why the authors refer to Komaguchi et al (who cloned the chicken Lmbr1

gene) as our lab, since any of the authors are common. Revised.

2) To complete Fig. 1 please mark the position of Primer 13 (R) Revised.

3) Page 17 line 14, should be gAA > gAB >gBB Revised.

4) Page 25 line 18, should be 1254C1255G Revised.

*******

melody 提供的催稿信模板

Dear Dr. ***:

I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted

manuscript titled \"****\" (Ms. Ref. No.: ****) although the status of \"with editor\" for my

manuscript have been lasting for more than ***** weeks. I am just wondering

that my manuscript

has been send to reviewers or not?

Best regards

***

我的一封投稿信

Dear Editor：

This was my article for your magazine“Preparation and Structure Characterization of Long Single

Crystalline CuO Nanoribbons” In this communication, we have developed a novel simple and

convenient route to the abundant synthesis of long CuO nanoribbons on conducting Aluminium

substrate. TEM and XRD studies indicated that these CuO nanoribbons were single crystal with

single crystalline plane of monoclinic {111}. The nanoribbons obtained are about several hundreds

nanometers in width, from tens to one hundred nanometers in thickness and their length can be up

to one hundred microns. Because these CuO nanoribbons not only are perfect single crystalline

but also are single crystalline plane, they can be expected to have special properties and purpose,

such as nanoelectronic device and heterogeneous catalyst etc. In addition, the novel method seems

can also be used to prepare 1D nanostructures of other metallic oxides.

yours sincerely

**************

我的知识产权证明

Dear editors:

I am a Dr of **** University in China. Now I will submit my manuscript entitled “Fabrication of

Copolymer(core)-Palladium(shell) Composite Microspheres and Their

Successful Application to

the Solvent-Free Heck Reactions” to Chemical Engineering Science, and none of the work has

been published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. This manuscript presents an

in-suit synthetic method for the preparation of Poly

(St-co-MAA)(core)-Pd(shell) composite

microspheres with dense Pd shells coated on their surface. The wall thickness could be controlled

in the range of 30-50nm by this coating process. The composite spheres showed very good

catalytic activities in Heck coupling reactions and can be reused many times without loss of its

catalytic activities in the absence of organic solvent This method will attract great interest in the

preparation of other copolymer(core)-metal(shell) nanomaterials. So, I think this manuscript is

suitable for it. I would be very happy if I can get your reply as soon as possible.

If there are any questions, please contact with me.

Authors: *****, *****@yahoo.com.cn

Tel: +86-***-2852533 Fax: +86-***-2852533

Current address: The Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials, ******

Corresponding author: ******

The software used: Microsoft word 2000 (text file), Photoshop 6.0

Yours Sincerely

********

Oct,20, 2004

也是投稿信

背景：我以前的老美老板写的投稿信,非常简单

Editorial Office

Journal of Physical Chemistry

Gentlemen:

I submit the letter, “xxxxx题目”, by 作者. It contains our findings on the attachment of gold

nanoparticles to functionalzied multiwalled carbon nanotubes. My coauthors and I believe that this

new information, on a subject relevant to nanophase physical chemistry, merits consideration for

publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. It has not been submitted elsewhere

My coauthors and I offer the following people as possible reviewers:

Prof. xxx

Chemistry Department

University of xxx

xxxxx

E-mail:*********.edu

Prof. xx xx

School of Engineering and Electronic

The Scottish Microelectronics Centre

University of Edinburgh

King's Buildings

West Mains Road

Edinburgh, EH9 3JF

UK

Email:***********.uk

Prof. xx xxx

Unité de Chimie des Matériaux Inorganiques et Organiques

Université Catholique de Louvain

Place Louis Pasteur 1/3

B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium,

E-mail:*************.ac.be

We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely yours,

投稿人

还是投稿信

背景：我的投稿信

Dear Dr. ****

We would like to submit our paper entitled “*****” to *****. The present work has not been

published elsewhere and is not being submitted to any other journal. We will appreciate very much

if the present paper can be reviewed critically and any comment, suggestion and advice from the

reviewers will be welcome.

Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to **** at the following

address, phone and fax number, and e-mail address：

Enclosure:

1. An original and three copies of the manuscript;

投稿信及编辑回复

背景情况：各位虫友，大家好！下面是我刚投稿的一点历经，分享给大

家！

我的投稿信:

Dear Editor：

Enclosed are three copies of a manuscript by *** titled“***”．It is submitted to be considered for

publication as a“Original Article\" in your journal．This paper is neither the entire paper nor any

part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere ．It is not being submitted to

any other journal．We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal

because it provides valuable data and a new method to predict ***.

Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to *** at the following

address，phone and fax number，and e-mail address:

***，Doctoral candidate of structure engineering,

Dept. of Structural Engineering,

*** University,

** Road,

***, P. R. China.

Tel：***;

Fax：***;

E-mail：：***

Thanks very much for your attention to our paper．

Sincerely yours，

编辑部回复：

Ms. Ref. No.: ***-D-06-***

Title: ***

Engineering Structures

Dear ***,

Your submission entitled ***\" will be handled by Editor *** .

You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to the

Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is

http://ees.elsevier.com.

Your username is: ***

Your password is: ***

Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.

Kind regards,

背景情况：论文审阅以后迟迟未收到审稿人的意见，询问网上系统是否

出了问题。

我的去信：

Dear Darren Spencer

From Editor I knew the review have completed and uploaded their revised advice the online

system around November 2. But I did not get it. So please get the revised advice from the editor. I

expect you can send these information to my mailbox.

Thank you very much.

your sincerely

×××

对方回信：

Dear ×××,

Thank you for your reply.

Please be advised that I have requested that the handling editor of the paper to forward you on the

reviewer comments so that you will be able to submit your revised submission.

If you require any further assistance then please feel free to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

*********

又一封投稿信

Dear Editor William Pennington,

We want to submit our manuscript with the title